Four ways to see the numbers before you commit to anything.
Estimate the pipeline your outbound engine could produce, compare DIY hiring against an outsourced BOT engagement, size the cost of staying stalled, or size your total addressable market. Every number is visible instantly — nothing is gated. Adjust anything and it recalculates live.
No black box. Here's the actual math.
Per-rep meeting output
At full ramp, a senior SDR produces ~6 qualified meetings/month and a junior SDR ~4/month, running our 24-day, 18-step multichannel cadence (80–120 emails, 20–30 LinkedIn touches and 30–50 dials/day, per rep).
Month 1 / Month 3 / Month 6+
New engagements don't start at full output. We apply ~30% of full-ramp productivity in Month 1, ~65% by Month 3, and 100% by Month 6 — matching our standard BOT onboarding curve.
Spreading across geographies
Running outbound in more than one market at once costs some per-market focus — research, timing windows and messaging localization all take rep time. We apply a modest efficiency discount for 2+ markets.
Meetings → pipeline → customers
We use a 35% meeting-to-opportunity conversion rate and an 18% opportunity-to-closed-won rate — the midpoints of our standard 30–40% and 15–20% benchmark ranges, applied against your ACV.
Tools, ramp time & attrition
The DIY vs. Outsourced comparison adds a 35% loading on top of base salary to account for tools/tech stack, unproductive ramp months, and typical SDR attrition risk — costs that rarely show up in a hiring plan until month four.
What a rep can realistically run
The TAM calculator assumes a rep can meaningfully run multichannel cadence against ~150 unique accounts per month, and that ~7% of properly-cadenced accounts yield a qualified meeting — both drawn from our engagement data.
These are directional models. Your plan should be built on your actual data.
Book a 30-minute call and we'll build the real version of any of these — using your CRM data, your ICP and your market — not a generic estimate.